What Military Veteran Firefighters Need To Know About The AFFF Lawsuit

Latest News

Concerned about AFFF’s safety? This firefighting foam, also known as AFFF, has become the center of a significant lawsuit due to the alleged health risks from PFAS chemicals. This article delves into the claims, the stakeholders involved, and the strides toward holding manufacturers accountable, offering essential insights for military veteran firefighters caught up in this issue.

Key Takeaways

  • The AFFF MDL combines thousands of claims against chemical producers for making PFAS-containing foams linked to serious health risks, including cancer and organ damage.
  • Firefighters, military personnel, and residents near fire training facilities are at increased risk due to PFAS exposure from AFFF, leading to a wide range of health problems and the need for fluorine-free alternatives.
  • Those affected by AFFF exposure—particularly firefighters and military veterans—may be eligible for compensation and are supported by advocates like Benjamin Krause in their legal battles against manufacturers.

Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Overview

AFFF is a lifesaver in the world of firefighting, particularly for extinguishing flammable liquid fires. But it’s also at the center of a significant legal action – the AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL). This lawsuit combines thousands of claims against major chemical producers such as 3M, DuPont, and Chemguard, accused of manufacturing harmful PFAS-containing foams. The MDL serves to consolidate these numerous lawsuits into a unified legal effort against the very companies that supplied local fire departments with these firefighting foams.

The reason these companies face legal scrutiny is due to the presence of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in their foam products. It’s all due to the presence of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in their foam products. These chemicals are not only harmful to human health but also persistent in the environment, earning them the moniker “forever chemicals”. The lawsuit aims to make these manufacturers answer for their role in producing and disseminating these dangerous substances, highlighting the need for fluorine free foam alternatives.

Manufacturers of the foam intentionally added PFAS during the manufacturing process making it a hazardous substance. Many fire departments, including the military, used the PFAS substances where the foam solution is linked to the current disabilities of many veterans.

Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Plaintiffs Claim Cancer Risk

Firefighter in action

Plaintiffs in the AFFF lawsuit aren’t just making empty claims. They argue that exposure to firefighting foam, particularly those containing PFAS, increases cancer risk. Cancer is only one aspect of the health concerns. There are multiple health issues linked to these toxic chemicals, making the lawsuit more than just speculation. Some of the health issues linked to these toxic chemicals include:

  • Liver damage
  • Kidney damage
  • Thyroid disease
  • Reproductive issues
  • Developmental delays in children

This long list of health issues linked to these toxic chemicals makes the lawsuit much more than a mere speculation.

Firefighters, who regularly use these foams for extinguishing class B fire, such as flammable liquid fires, are particularly at risk. These brave individuals, members of the fire department, who put their lives on the line to save others, are now facing an unseen enemy – one that can’t be extinguished with a foam blanket or fire suppression techniques. The fire fighting foam coalition lawsuit is their fight for justice, a fight against an enemy that came disguised as a lifesaver.

Other Injuries Linked To AFFF Exposure

Aside from cancer, AFFF exposure has been linked to a variety of health problems. Kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and reproductive issues are just a few of the health complications associated with these harmful firefighting foams. The scope of conditions is broad, and the impact on firefighters and other exposed individuals is significant.

Firefighters are not the only ones at risk. Military personnel, residents living near fire training facilities, and communities where these foams are produced also face potential danger. Military personnel, residents living near fire training facilities, and even communities where these foams are produced are at risk. The danger is widespread, making the goal of the lawsuit not only to seek compensation for impacted individuals but also to prevent further harm to others.

What Is Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF)?

Aqueous Film-Forming Foam

So, what exactly is this Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) that’s causing so much trouble? AFFF, also known as class b foam, is a type of firefighting foam primarily used to suppress flammable liquid fires. It forms a blanket over the fire, cutting off the oxygen supply and cooling the fire. It’s especially effective against class B fires, which involve flammable liquids like gasoline and oil.

The problem with AFFF lies in its formulations. Many contain harmful PFAS chemicals, introduced to enhance the foam’s fire-suppressing properties. While effective in firefighting, these PFAS-containing foams pose a significant risk to human health and the environment. The use of fluorine free firefighting foams, such as foam concentrate alternatives, can help mitigate these risks.

What Is PFAS?

PFAS, or Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, are a group of man-made chemicals used widely in various industries. They’re found in everything from food packaging to stain-resistant fabrics and nonstick cookware. Their most infamous application is indeed in firefighting foams.

These chemicals are particularly concerning because they don’t break down easily in the environment or the human body, earning them the nickname “forever chemicals”. They can accumulate over time, leading to increased health risks. This characteristic of persistence, combined with their widespread use, makes PFAS an issue of global concern.

AFFF Firefighting Foam Health Risks

Now that we know what AFFF and PFAS are, let’s delve into the health risks associated with AFFF exposure. Research has linked PFAS to a variety of health problems, from cancer to thyroid disease and reproductive issues. The risk is even higher for those with long-term exposure, like our firefighter and military personnel who frequently use these foams.

Immediate health risks are only part of the problem. PFAS chemicals can stay in the body for years, potentially leading to long-term health problems. PFAS chemicals can stay in the body for years, potentially leading to long-term health problems. It’s a ticking time bomb, and the countdown starts with exposure to AFFF.

Injuries Linked To Firefighting Foam PFAS

Specific injuries have been linked to firefighting foam PFAS exposure. These include kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and reproductive issues. The list of potential health problems is alarming and underscores the severity of the issue at hand.

Each of these conditions can significantly impact an individual’s life, leading to physical suffering, emotional distress, and financial burden. The lawsuit aims to provide these individuals with the compensation they deserve, holding manufacturers accountable for their role in this health crisis.

Toxic Firefighting Foam Cancer Risk

Let’s zero in on the cancer risk associated with toxic firefighting foam. Studies have shown that exposure to PFAS chemicals can increase the risk of several types of cancer, including kidney and testicular cancer. These findings have been a critical factor in driving the AFFF lawsuit and raising awareness about the dangers of these foams.

There are multiple health issues linked to these toxic chemicals, making the lawsuit more than just speculation. PFAS exposure has been linked to:

  • Cancer
  • Liver damage
  • Increased cholesterol levels
  • Decreased vaccine response in children
  • Increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia in pregnant women

The health implications are far-reaching and alarming.

Who Is At Risk Of Firefighting Foam Injuries?

So, who’s most at risk of injuries from firefighting foam? Firefighters top the list, given their frequent use of these foams in training and real-world situations. Military personnel, particularly those involved in firefighting duties, are also at high risk due to their extensive use of AFFF in suppressing flammable liquid fires.

However, the risk extends beyond those directly handling the foam. People living near fire training facilities, military bases, or manufacturing sites where these foams are produced or used may also be exposed to PFAS through contaminated air, soil, or drinking water. These at-risk groups are the focus of the AFFF lawsuit, seeking justice for those harmed by PFAS exposure.

Did You Suffer A Firefighting Foam Injury?

If you’re reading this, you might be wondering, “What if I’ve suffered an injury due to AFFF exposure?” Maybe you’re a firefighter, a military veteran, or a resident living near a fire training facility. If you’ve been exposed to AFFF and subsequently developed health issues, you might be eligible for compensation.

The AFFF lawsuit aims to hold manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by their products and provide compensation to those affected. If you’ve been injured due to AFFF exposure, consider reaching out to a legal professional to discuss your options.

Filing an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit

Filing an AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit can be a significant step towards seeking justice. The process may seem daunting, but with the right legal guidance, it becomes a lot more manageable. The goal of the lawsuit is to call manufacturers to account for their product’s damages and secure compensation for the victims.

When you file a lawsuit, you stand up not only for yourself but also for countless others affected by AFFF exposure. You’re also standing up for countless others who have been affected by AFFF exposure. It’s a fight for justice, a fight against an unseen enemy, and a fight that you don’t have to face alone.

The Role of Advocates like Benjamin Krause

Advocates like Benjamin Krause are instrumental in this struggle. As a disabled veteran and attorney, Krause deeply understands the challenges faced by military personnel and veterans. His law firm, Krause Law, represents individuals affected by AFFF exposure, providing legal guidance and helping them understand their rights and eligibility for compensation.

Krause’s work has not gone unnoticed. In 2013, he received the Top 25 Veterans Voice Award, highlighting his significant contributions to veterans’ advocacy. His work as an advocate and attorney has since been highlighted in regional and national news publications, including Newsweek, Foreign Policy, Washington Times, and Star Tribune.

With advocates like Krause on their side, those affected by AFFF exposure are not alone in their fight.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AFFF foam hazardous?

Yes, AFFF foam is considered hazardous due to its content of PFAS, which have been linked to negative impacts on human health and the environment. The substance is regulated by organizations such as OSHA and is associated with cancer and other health concerns.

Is AFFF foam still used today?

Yes, AFFF foam is still used today for specific critical situations where its benefits outweigh the risk of fire destruction.

When did they stop using AFFF?

They stopped using AFFF firefighting foam that contains PFAS in March 2023 and will phase out the dangerous firefighting foam by 2024.

What has replaced AFFF foam?

The AFFF foam has been replaced by F3 according to the DoD specifications, which have been funding F3 product development since 2017. This transition received a boost when the DoD released specifications for F3 on January 6, 2023.

What is AFFF?

AFFF stands for Aqueous Film-Forming Foam and is used to extinguish flammable liquid fires, but it often contains harmful PFAS chemicals. Be cautious when using it.

Related Articles